UGL Sarm S4 aka Acetamidoxolutamide lab tested by the "German Center for Preventive Doping Research"

It looks like my theory that no SARMs could be third party lab tested at the normal venues due to lack of reference samples was correct. The guys who conducted these first tests had to go to the trouble of synthesizing their own Acetamidoxolutamide and then comparing it to the sample they purchased from the blackmarket.

It turns out that the Acetamidoxolutamide being sold in 30ml volumes for 'research purposes' is the real thing but is highly overdosed at approx 150mg/ml rather than the advertised 100mg/ml.

Even without an official launch, S-4 is available on an Internet website as a bottled solution with the declaration that the product is not intended for human use. Due to the potential misuse of such compounds when being available unrestrictedly and the well documented fact that numerous counterfeit products are sold on the so-called black market, one unit (30 mL) was purchased online and delivered in a box labelled as containing face moisturizer and green tea extract. The sealed bottles did not declare any content and no further documents accompanied the package.

Major concerns result from these findings, in particular the concern that this product with considerable anabolic properties is readily available without sufficient research on its undesirable effects; this is especially significant where uncontrolled dosing is applied and drug impurities with unknown effects are present in considerable amounts as observed in the studied material. Such impurities can serve, however, as distinctive feature to differentiate a pharmaceutical product from black-market substances. With regard to sports drug testing it must be stressed that preventive doping research is essential to limit the options of cheating athletes who aim to undermine doping control systems. The present report demonstrates once more that the misuse of therapeutics in early or advanced clinical trials by athletes cannot be dismissed, especially when anecdotal evidence for the misuse of S-4 is frequently discussed in respective Internet-based chat rooms.